Product validation through continuous discovery

The tools and techniques to make sure we’re building the right thing are available to any enterprise. Are you really making use of them?

Google invented the design sprint way back in 2010 as a means of validating what’s built. Yet more than a decade on, it’s still surprisingly rare to find organisations that use this proven way of working and embed it into a habitual, everyday practice as part of continuous product improvement.

This is especially the case in Aotearoa where the transition from project to product thinking is still at a relatively early stage. Few enterprises have invested in building the teams to do it and fewer still consider their team’s work as part of Value Stream integration focused on delighting customers. Without effective product validation efforts and continuous product improvement based on rapid prototyping methods, you’re wasting effort, disappointing customers and diverting resources away from things that might deliver much more value.

The process of building the right thing (as opposed to building the thing right), is a critical skill for any organisation – from startups pivoting towards value, disrupted cash cows that have lost their innovation gene and any other business mired in complacent entropy and mediocrity. And the good news is that validation processes have evolved, become more accurate and are simpler to adopt.

It’s never been easier to identify customer value signals in new concepts, business models and feature ideas. It can be done both qualitatively and quantitatively in short cycle times, often without the need to engage external agencies and gift them a mountain of money.

We can do all these things…

All of this helps us discern value from noise, dodge the bias and build clear blue water between us and the competition. In progressive businesses, these validation processes are used extensively by small teams of people to increase the chances that the overall Value Stream is building the right things for customers. And they’re doing it in low-cost rapid cycles in tandem with delivery sprints. You can do this too.

At HYPR, we call this capability ‘Continuous Discovery' and it’s a critical component of your holistic customer value delivery system. We can help you create one aligned team with continuous flow of the highest value output. How does that sound?

Let’s talk.

Gareth Evans

Founder/Partner HYPR, AI SDLC advocate, technology advisor, expert in flow, lean and agile ways of working.

More
Ideas

Why software teams are shrinking to three people

Software teams are shrinking. Not because organisations are cutting headcount for its own sake but because AI agents are absorbing work that used to require five, seven or ten people to negotiate interfaces and split stories. The emerging unit is three humans and a constellation of agents.

> Read

Data and analytics: are you asking the right questions?

The conversation around Artificial Intelligence in enterprise settings often focuses on the technology itself – the models, capabilities, impressive demonstrations. However, the real question organisations should be asking is not whether AI is powerful, but whether they are prepared to harness that power effectively.

> Read

The future of voice intelligence

The intersection of Artificial Intelligence and voice technology has opened fascinating possibilities for understanding human characteristics through audio alone. When we hear someone speak on the phone, we naturally form impressions about their age, gender and other attributes based solely on their voice.

> Read

Is AI the golden age for technologists?

The technology landscape is experiencing a profound change that extends beyond the capabilities of Artificial Intelligence tools. We’re witnessing a fundamental shift in how people engage with technology, build software and think about their careers in the digital space. This shift raises a compelling question... Are we entering a golden age for technologists?

> Read

The IT fossil record: layers of architectural evolution

The metaphor of an IT fossil record captures something interesting about how architectural thinking has evolved over decades. Like geological strata, each architectural era has left its mark, with some layers proving more durable than others. The question remains whether we’ve reached bedrock or continue to build on shifting sands.

> Read